Confusion over KCET results as some students not alloted rankings
The Karnataka Examination Authority (KEA) recently faced a wave of confusion and discontent among students and parents when it was revealed that the qualifying examination (class 12) scores were not considered for ranking in the Karnataka Common Entrance Test (KCET). This decision led to a significant number of students not obtaining their desired ranks, prompting protests and concerns regarding the ranking process. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind this issue and explore the implications it has on the KCET ranking system.
1. The Absence of Qualifying Examination Marks in KCET Ranking
When the KCET results were announced, students and parents gathered at KEA to voice their dissatisfaction over the fact that the qualifying examination marks were not taken into account for ranking. Despite uploading their papers during the application procedure, many students discovered that their ranks were not assigned. This discrepancy caused frustration and confusion among the affected candidates.
2. Manual Entry of QE Marks and PDF Attachments
One of the reasons behind the absence of qualifying examination (QE) marks in the ranking process was the method of submission chosen by the candidates. Some students claimed that they did not manually enter their QE marks but instead attached their mark sheet as a PDF document. According to a KEA official, this approach was not acceptable, as candidates from the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and Indian Certificate of Secondary Education (ICSE) were required to manually enter their QE marks rather than submitting them as attachments.
3. Consequences of Incorrect Student Number and Mark Sheet Attachments
A representative from KEA emphasized that incorrect student numbers provided during the application procedure would lead to the rejection of QE marks. Furthermore, candidates from CBSE and ICSE were specifically instructed to manually enter their QE marks. Failure to follow these instructions resulted in the non-assignment of ranks. The KEA representative clarified that state board students' marks would be automatically considered by the authority, while students from other boards had to input their QE results manually.
4. Remedial Measures and Announcement of New URL
To address the concerns raised by candidates regarding the exclusion of QE marks, the KEA announced that a new URL would be made available for candidates to re-enter their QE scores. This move aimed to rectify the issue and ensure that deserving candidates receive their appropriate ranks. The revised rankings will be announced within the next two days, and the KEA official stated that the ranks are unlikely to be rearranged based on the new ranking allocation.
5. Criticisms of KEA's Conduct and Guidelines
The confusion and discontent surrounding the exclusion of QE marks once again shed light on the perceived incompetence of the KEA in conducting hassle-free examinations. Students like Divya R expressed their disappointment, stating, "This confusion once again demonstrates KEA's incompetence in conducting hassle-free examinations. The guidelines given throughout the application procedure are one thing, but when the results are published, the officials issue new rules." Another candidate, Prajwal Kumar, lamented the impact of the management issues, saying, "The hard work of two years just goes to waste because of the horrible management of KEA. This is always the case."
Conclusion
The omission of qualifying examination marks in the KCET ranking process has sparked discontent and confusion among students and parents. The requirement for manual entry of QE marks for certain boards and the rejection of marks due to incorrect student numbers have exacerbated the problem. The KEA's decision to allow candidates to re-enter their QE scores through a new URL is a step towards resolving the issue and providing fair rankings to deserving candidates. However, the incident highlights the need for better communication and transparency from the KEA throughout the application and ranking process.
In conclusion, the exclusion of qualifying examination marks in the KCET ranking system has caused dissatisfaction and confusion among students and parents. The requirement for manual entry of QE marks and the rejection of marks due to incorrect student numbers have further exacerbated the problem. The KEA's decision to allow candidates to re-enter their QE scores through a new URL shows an effort to rectify the issue. However, it also highlights the need for improved communication and clarity from the KEA to ensure a fair and transparent ranking process for all candidates.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Will the inclusion of qualifying examination marks affect the KCET ranking?
The inclusion of qualifying examination marks is essential for determining the ranks of KCET candidates. Therefore, if a candidate's qualifying examination marks were not considered initially, their ranking may change once the scores are included.
2. Can candidates from CBSE and ICSE boards attach their mark sheet as a PDF document?
No, candidates from CBSE and ICSE boards must manually enter their qualifying examination marks instead of attaching the mark sheet as a PDF document.
3. What happens if a candidate enters an incorrect student number during the application procedure?
If a candidate enters an incorrect student number during the application procedure, their qualifying examination marks will not be accepted, and their rank may be affected as a result.
4. Will state board students have their marks automatically considered by the KEA?
Yes, the KEA will automatically consider the marks of state board students. They do not need to manually enter their qualifying examination marks.
5. How long will it take for the revised rankings to be announced?
The revised rankings will be announced within the next two days after candidates have re-entered their qualifying examination scores.
